Elon Musk’s $1 Trillion Pay Package: Visionary Reward or Corporate Risk?

Elon Musk on stage at Tesla’s annual meeting after shareholders approve his record-breaking pay package in Austin, Texas.

A Vote Like No Other

At Tesla’s annual meeting in Austin, shareholders handed Elon Musk something few executives have ever seen — approval for a pay package potentially worth nearly $1 trillion.
Seventy-five percent of votes were cast in favour, punctuated by cheers as Musk danced across the stage.

“What we’re about to embark upon is not merely a new chapter of Tesla, but a whole new book,” Musk declared to a roaring crowd.

The package, structured entirely in stock options, requires Musk to raise Tesla’s market value to $8.5 trillion — up from $1.4 trillion today — and to launch a million robotaxi vehicles into commercial service.

(Read more global leadership stories in our Business Insights section)


A Reward for Vision — or a Risk for Shareholders?

Tesla’s board argued that the deal was necessary to keep Musk engaged, warning the company could lose its driving force without it.

Yet critics questioned the scale and governance. Major institutional investors including Norway’s Sovereign Wealth Fund and CalPERS voted against the proposal, citing poor oversight and excessive concentration of power.

Still, Tesla’s large retail investor base pushed the deal through — a reflection of Musk’s celebrity status as much as his leadership.

(Compare with our analysis on Corporate Governance in the AI Era)


The Conditions Behind the Trillion

To unlock the full payout, Musk must:

  • Grow Tesla’s market cap to $8.5 trillion
  • Launch 1 million self-driving robotaxis
  • Deliver breakthrough progress in AI and humanoid robots (“Optimus”)
  • Sustain long-term profit and revenue targets

If successful, his ownership stake could exceed 20%, granting him de facto control over Tesla.

(Explore our deep dive on AI and Mental Health Across Cultures to see how tech visionaries reshape multiple industries.)


From Cars to Optimus — Musk’s New Obsession

While investors expected updates on Tesla’s EV sales, Musk spotlighted Optimus, the company’s humanoid robot project.

“Other shareholder meetings are snoozefests, but ours are bangers,” he joked, adding that the “new book” of Tesla begins with robotics.

That focus worried analysts like Gene Munster who wanted renewed attention to EV production.


AI Ambition and Safety Concerns

Musk hinted that Tesla’s Full Self-Driving (FSD) tech was nearing maturity, saying drivers were “almost comfortable texting and driving.”
But U.S. regulators are investigating FSD after multiple accidents linked to autopilot use.

Tech analyst Dan Ives of Wedbush Securities remains bullish:

“The march to an AI-driven valuation for TSLA has now begun.”


Financial Reality vs Public Perception

Tesla’s stock has risen 62% in six months, but sales growth lags amid competition and political polarisation.

Investor Ross Gerber of Gerber Kawasaki said his firm reduced its stake:

“Elon seems divorced from the reality that his public opinion is so low.”

(For market context, see our latest Global Economic Pulse Report)


Legal Shadows and Governance Debate

A similar 2018 pay package was struck down by a Delaware judge over board conflicts.
Since then, Tesla has reincorporated in Texas, and the Delaware Supreme Court is reviewing the case.

Legal expert Ann Lipton of the University of Colorado notes that the new agreement again places no limits on Musk’s activities outside Tesla.


A Symbol of Modern Capitalism

For Musk’s supporters, this package rewards visionary risk-taking. For critics, it epitomises the age of the cult CEO.
Either way, the vote underscores how personality, technology and capital are intertwined in today’s markets.

(Discover similar stories in our Tech & Innovation section)


Written by the Global In Brief Business Desk

Examining how leadership, technology and capital shape the new economy.

Trump’s Green Card Shake-Up: What You Need to Know in 2025

U.S. Capitol silhouette and green card icon symbolising policy changes under the Trump administration.

Trump’s Green Card Shake-Up: What You Need to Know in 2025

When you think of a green card, you may imagine stability and permanence. But under the current Donald Trump administration, dozens of long-held assumptions about lawful permanent residency are being challenged.
From travel restrictions to deportation flags, the message is clear: “Green card” no longer simply means “forever safe.”


Stricter Travel Rules — Green Card Doesn’t Guarantee Safe Return

One of the biggest changes: non-citizens, including green card holders, are now subject to advanced biometric tracking when entering or leaving the United States. Moneycontrol
The implications? If you’re abroad for six months or more, or cross a land border rather than fly, you may suddenly face questions about whether you’ve abandoned your residency.

“Green card holders may be at risk … if they’ve been gone longer than one year,” warns legal guidance from National Immigration Law Center. NILC
This is not just a travel inconvenience — it’s a potential legal trap.


Deportation Risk Ramps Up for Some Residents

Long-term residents once assumed they were insulated from removal. Not anymore.
According to NILC guidance, green card holders with certain past convictions (even for drugs or theft) or who engage in political activism deemed hostile may face deportation. NILC
In international communities, especially among Indian and South Asian immigrants, deportation fears are now heightened. The Economic Times
The takeaway: permanent status isn’t always permanent.


The “Marriage Path” Isn’t Immune Either

Marriage to a U.S. citizen or securing a green card via a spouse has long been a reliable path. Under this policy environment, even “conditional” green cards (granted via marriage under 2 years) warrant extra scrutiny.
If you acquired conditional permanent residency, your timeline remains tight — and enforcement is sharper than ever.


What Applicants Should Watch Before Applying

The policy climate is shifting. Here’s what new applicants should keep in mind:

  • Poverty or public-benefit use may be weighed more heavily under new proposed rule changes. Newsweek
  • Criminal or immigration-law violations (including old ones) can disqualify applicants or trigger revocation later.
  • Staying abroad too long (6+ months or a year) may suggest abandonment of residency. NILC
  • Political activity, especially overseas, is under unexpected scrutiny.

Global Impact & What It Means for Non-U.S. Residents

For readers in India, the Philippines, Nigeria or Brazil, the message is especially relevant. U.S. diaspora communities who travel frequently or hold dual residencies are now navigating a more precarious landscape.
One blog post from India’s media expressed it plainly: “Thousands of green card holders in the United States … now face increased uncertainty and fear of deportation.” The Economic Times
In a globalised world, a green card may still mean opportunity — but it now also signals fragility.


Conclusion — Stable Residency? It’s No Longer a Given.

If there’s one takeaway, it’s this: Under Trump’s administration, the green card is less a permanent guarantee and more a privilege contingent on behaviour, travel patterns and compliance.
For lawful permanent residents and those considering it, staying informed is no longer optional — it’s essential.

✍️ Written by the Global In Brief Editorial Team — exploring the intersection of humanity, migration and policy.